| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Blood, 15 July 2008, Vol. 112, No. 2, pp. 214.
Th17 and cancer: friends or foes?ISTITUTO ONCOLOGICO VENETO
Adoptive transfer of tumor-reactive CD8+ T lymphocytes is one of the most effective immunotherapy approaches for the treatment of solid tumors.1 Muranski and colleagues show that a recently identified population of CD4+ T lymphocytes called Th17 cells possesses unexpected antimyeloma therapeutic properties.
Th17 cells represent the latest addition to this group. Their differentiation is driven primarily by TGF-β and IL-6 cytokines, whereas IL-23, originally thought to be the master regulator, seems to be important for maintenance of Th17 responses. Th17 cells release IL-17 and IL-22, and are implicated in the induction of numerous autoimmune and inflammatory responses.2 The information about the relevance of this cell subset in cancer biology is scant and contradictory. IL-23 has been shown to promote tumor growth and impair antitumor CD8+ T cells3 but, on the other hand, dendritic cells transduced with IL-23 have been described as triggering powerful antitumor activity.4 These discrepancies might result from the oft-described dichotomous nature of the effects of endogenous production as compared with unregulated engineered release of the same cytokine. However, the effects of IL-23 alone cannot be taken as a bona fide demonstration of Th17 cell involvement. Indeed, few reports have addressed the presence of Th17 cells in experimental and human tumors,5 and none provide a clear indication about either a protumoral or antitumoral activity.
Muranski and colleagues used transgenic mice expressing a high-affinity T-cell receptor (TCR) specific for an epitope of the melanoma antigen known as tyrosinase-related protein 1 (TRP-1). Exploiting different polarizing culture conditions in vitro, the authors drove TRP-1–specific CD4+ T cells toward either Th0, Th1, or Th17 cells. Upon adoptive transfer in mice bearing established cutaneous melanomas, Th17 cells were shown to be superior in mediating both rejection of established melanoma and autoimmune vitiligo. Interestingly, therapeutic activity depended on Th17-cell release of IFN- The findings of Muranski and coworkers raise some interesting questions. If Th17 cells are so effective in destroying tissues, what limits their armamentarium during tumor development? Do Tregs play a role, as suggested by some studies5? For clinical translation, it will also be extremely important to understand whether concomitant autoimmunity can be controlled or mitigated, if this approach is to be extended to tumors other than melanomas.
Footnotes
Conflict-of-interest disclosure: The author declares no competing financial interests.
REFERENCES
Related Article in Blood Online:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Copyright © 2008 by American Society of Hematology Online ISSN: 1528-0020 | |||||||||