Blood online
Home About Blood Authors Subscriptions Permission Advertising Public Access contact us
 

 
Advanced
Current Issue
First Edition
Future Articles
Archives
Submit to Blood
Search
American Society of Hematology
Meeting Abstracts
Email Alerts
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rothstein, G.
Right arrow Articles by Gillis, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rothstein, G.
Right arrow Articles by Gillis, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

arrow to previous article Previous Article  |  Table of Contents  |  Next Article next article arrow

Stimulation of neutrophil production in CSF-1-responsive clones

G Rothstein, SM Rhondeau, CA Peters, RD Christensen, D Lynch and S Gillis

Division of Human Development and Aging, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City 84132.

The hematopoietic growth factor CSF-1 has been considered relatively lineage specific for the production of macrophages, whereas GM-CSF elicits a predominance of neutrophils. It is likely that in vivo, individual clones are stimulated by the two CSFs, although the effect of dual stimulation on progenitors and their progeny has not been completely explored. We found that in cultures initiated with low concentrations of CSF-1 or GM-CSF, alone or in combination, production of macrophages predominated. Maximally stimulatory concentrations of CSF-1 elicited a predominance of macrophages, whereas maximal GM-CSF elicited many more neutrophil/macrophage colonies and pure neutrophil colonies. A combination of maximal CSF-1 and GM-CSF elicited the same differentiation as GM-CSF alone. Delayed addition of GM-CSF to cultures initiated with CSF-1 elicited colonies indistinguishable from GM-CSF alone, suggesting that neutrophil production had been switched on by GM- CSF. In mapping studies, colonies initiated by CSF-1 increased or switched on neutrophil production when GM-CSF was added as a second stimulus. These studies show that individual clones are responsive to both CSFs, and that the differentiating influence of GM-CSF predominates over that of CSF-1. In cultures to which only CSF-1 was added, a population of progenitors was sustained that produced neutrophils only after a GM-CSF stimulus. Thus, CSF-1 may participate in maintaining a reserve of progenitors for neutrophils during periods of increased neutrophil demand.

Volume 72, Issue 3, pp. 898-902, 09/01/1988
Copyright © 1988 by The American Society of Hematology


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?




 click for free articles
home about blood authors subscriptions permissions advertising public access contact us
  Copyright © 1988 by American Society of Hematology         Online ISSN: 1528-0020